MARIN
BIOLOGIC
CONTRACT RESEARCH LABORATORIES
Quantitation
of Growth of Shigella Dysenteriae,
Salmonella choleraesuis, Listeria
monocytogenes, Esherichia coli on Cardboard and
ABS Plastic Surfaces
Final Report Submitted to:
Mr. Ken Krall, President
KenKut
Products, Inc.
P.O. Box 704
San Anselmo, CA 94979
PH: 415-454-2311
FAX: 415-459-2311 |
Submitted by:
Tania L. Weiss, Ph.D.
Marin Biologic
3152 Paradise Drive
Tiburon, CA 94920
PHONE: 415-435-6636 FAX: 415-435-9299 |
DATE: June 10, 1998
SUMMARY:
Five infectious bacteria commonly found as kitchen/food contamination were
tested to determine whether growth on ABS plastic was inhibited compared to
cardboard and whether washing the plastic with kitchen antibacterial soap
inhibited bacterial growth. The experimental design was to transfer an array of
bacteria as discrete drops on to the plastic or cardboard. The plastic and
cardboard materials were incubated overnight then blotted onto a sterile agar
plate that would support bacterial growth. Data show that although the bacteria
grew little on plastic, if at all, they were still present. Even though the
bacteria were dried on the plastic, when the plastic was blotted onto sterile
agar growth medium, the inoculate was able to sustain growth. However, data show
that the antibacterial soap reduced/eliminated the bacterial contamination on
the plastic, so that when plastic was blotted onto sterile agar growth medium,
there was no bacterial growth. Data also show that moist/wet cardboard is a rich
medium for bacterial growth. The results demonstrate that a "lawn" of bacteria
grew on the sterile agar growth medium when the cardboard was blotted on the
surface.
METHODS and RESULTS:
View digital images of
bacteria growth
1 . Organisms:
Shigella dysenteriae ATCC #13313
Escherichia coli ATCC #15922
Salmonella choleraesuis ATCC #13311
Listeria monocytogenes ATCC #51414
Campylobacter jejuni ATCC #49943
2. Lyophilized
bacteria were resuspended in LB broth and incubated at 37°C
overnight to achieve a growing culture. The Campylobacter did not grow.
To
determine the concentration of bacteria which would grow as discrete,
individual colonies, serial dilutions of the E. coli were made (1 /10, 1 /100,
1
/1000, 1 /10,000, 1 /100,000, 1 /1,000,000) and 1 00ul of culture were
plated onto 100 CM²
agar plates. The plates were incubated
overnight at
37°C. The two concentrations resulting in individual colonies were
1/100,000 and 1/1,000,000. The optimum concentration was
approximately 1/500,000.
3. All the
bacteria were diluted to 1/500,000 and 1 /1,000,000 and 100ul of
culture were transferred to the agar plates and incubated overnight at
37°C. Depending upon the bacterial strain, the concentration was
appropriate, but there was uneven distribution of colonies. Some colonies
were very close together.
A blot of
the bacteria colonies was made by laying the plastic or cardboard
upon the agar plate in order to transfer the bacteria
to the test material. The
cardboard was pretreated by applying water to all
surfaces including between
the two faces in the corrugated portion.
The plastic and
cardboard were grown in a moist atmosphere, at 37°C
overnight. The bacteria were present on the plastic but did
not grow.
The cardboard contained a lawn of bacteria. These plates were
kept
at 4°C until they were digitally imaged.
4. A different approach was
used to minimize the visual bacterial detection
on the plastic.
Using a multichannel pipettor, less than I ul was applied as
individual spots
directly onto the plastic and dried cardboard. The plastic
was incubated
overnight at 37°C, in a moist atmosphere that was allowed
to dry out. The
cardboard was "floated" on water, and incubated in a moist
atmosphere overnight
at 37°C. The bacteria appeared as dried spots on
the plastic. On some
of the cardboard pieces, the bacteria could not be
visualized. On
others, the drops of bacteria were remained as drops rather
than soak into the
cardboard. One replicate set of plastic samples was
washed with a dilute
antibacterial soap. The washing process included
squirting the
samples five times with soap then squirting with purified
water to rinse off
the soap. The samples were air dried before blotting onto
the agar plates.
The plastic and
cardboard pieces were blotted onto a sterile agar plate.
The plates were
incubated at 37°C overnight and imaged using a digital
camera imaging
system. The photos were touched-up in Adobe Photoshop
and replicated in
floppy discs and hard copy. The agar plates blotted with the
unwashed plastic
materials resulted in the growth of small individual spots of
bacteria replicating
the pattern of the bacterial application to the plastic. The
agar plates blotted
with the washed plastic materials supported no growth of
bacteria. The agar
plates blotted with some of the cardboard showed a "lawn"
of bacteria. In agar
plates blotted with other cardboard samples a replicate pattern
of the bacterial
application to the plastic was observed, however, the colonies
were larger than
that on plastic indicating growth.
CONCLUSIONS
View digital images
of bacteria growth
The ABS plastic did not support the growth of the various bacteria, however,
the bacteria remained viable after 24 hours even after the medium in the drop
dried out. The wet cardboard is a rich medium supporting vigorous growth of the
bacteria. Washing the ABS plastic with antibacterial soap was an effective means
to reduce the organisms. In this case, all the bacteria were eliminated. In the
cardboard samples where the bacteria were applied to wet cardboard rather than
dry cardboard, and incubated in a moist atmosphere overnight at 37°C, a thicker
"lawn" of bacteria was observed. This suggests that either wet cardboard
supports better growth than moist cardboard or the results may be due to the
fact that the bacteria spread out during the application process, rather than
soak into the cardboard as discrete spots.
This scientific
report contains information and images
proprietary to
KENKUT ®
Products Inc. Any
reproduction,
disclosure or
use of its contents or any part thereof is
expressly
prohibited without prior written permission from
KENKUT ®
Products Inc.
Contact us
for more info
Go Back
US patent 4951858 other patents pending
Kenkut is a Registered Trademark of Kenkut Products Inc.
Proudly Made in USA
|